Searches for people

Officers searched the cameras for people by gender and clothing.

CGPD says they cannot search by gender.

That's not true.

On September 8, 2026, the Police Chief told City Council in writing that the system cannot search based on a person's face, gender, or ethnicity.

From October 2025 through January 2026, Casa Grande's own search logs show 84 searches for people by description, 22 of them for a "male" or "female." Two named a race. Flock blocked both; both were re-run without the word and went through.

84

searches for people by description, October 2025 to January 2026

22

of them specified "male" or "female"

6

searched for a child

2

blocked for race, then re-run without the word

The claim and the record

The council was told this capability does not exist. The logs show it in use.

The city told the council

“The cameras do not have or use facial recognition technology, nor can users search the system based on a person's face or facial features, gender, or ethnicity.”
Chief's agenda document, page 4

The record shows

Officers can, and did. Flock sells a search box called FreeForm, and Casa Grande has it turned on. From October 2025 through January 2026 the search logs show 84 searches for people by description. Stephanie Sjerven typed "male." Damian Guerrero typed "female wearing grey sweater." Kyle Short typed "person wearing black hoodie and black hat." Jeffrey McKean typed "child."

On December 9, 2025, Damian Guerrero typed "native female wearing grey hoodie with green lettering and black pants." Flock blocked it. Thirteen seconds later he typed the same thing without "native." It went through.

On October 21, 2025, Caleb Zadareky typed "hispanic male with a grey shirt, beanie, blue jeans and a backpack." Blocked. Later that day Christopher Mendez ran the same description without "hispanic" across 353 networks. Allowed.

Many of these searches were for runaways and missing people. That may be good police work. It is still a capability the council was told does not exist, and Flock's own patent describes sorting people by "male, female, race," clothing, and "height and weight."

84

searches for people by description in four months

The handout, page 4

Excerpt from page 4 of the city's handout: The cameras do not have or use facial recognition technology, nor can users search the system based on a person's face or facial features, gender, or ethnicity.
Tap to open the page in the city's handout.

See it yourself

Ask the council: is FreeForm people search still enabled, and who approved turning it on?

Blocked, then allowed

Flock blocked the word. It did not block the search.

Flock's software refuses a search that names a race. In both cases in the logs, the same description went through moments later without that word. Nobody outside the department was told. The department's policy says a flagged search goes up the chain to the Chief. The handout does not say whether that happened.

Oct 21, 2025

Reason given: "Plate number typed as the reason"

Caleb Zadareky Blocked

“hispanic male with a grey shirt, beanie, blue jeans and a backpack”

Flock blocked the word "hispanic."

Christopher Mendez Allowed

“male with a grey shirt, beanie, blue jeans and a green backpack”

Same description without "hispanic," later that day, across 353 networks and 6,806 cameras.

Open the log: Oct 2025 log, p. 11
Dec 9, 2025

Reason given: "Runaway"

Damian Guerrero Blocked

“native female wearing grey hoodie with green lettering and black pants”

Flock blocked the word "native."

Damian Guerrero Allowed

“female wearing grey hoodie with green lettering and black pants”

Same search without "native," 13 seconds later.

Open the log: Dec 2025 log, p. 44

The search log, December 2025, page 44

Excerpt from the December 2025 Casa Grande search log showing a FreeForm search for "native female wearing grey hoodie with green lettering and black pants" marked block, followed 13 seconds later by the same search without "native" marked allow.
Blocked at 3:01:00. Allowed at 3:01:13. As released by the city. Tap to open the page.

When Flock flags a search for race, who is told? Ask the council.

The searches, as released

What officers typed into the search box.

A sample of the 84 people searches, taken from the logs the city released. Many were for runaways and missing people. That may be good police work. It is still a capability the council was told does not exist.

All 84 people searches by month: October 2025: 2. November 2025: 47. December 2025: 25. January 2026: 10. Account names appear as the city released them. License plates were redacted by the city.

Date
Oct 21, 2025
Account
Caleb Zadareky
Reason given
Plate number typed as the reason
What was typed
"hispanic male with a grey shirt, beanie, blue jeans and a backpack" Flock blocked the word "hispanic."
Result
Blocked
Proof: Oct 2025 log, p. 11
Date
Oct 21, 2025
Account
Christopher Mendez
Reason given
investigation
What was typed
"male with a grey shirt, beanie, blue jeans and a green backpack" Same description without "hispanic," later that day, across 353 networks and 6,806 cameras.
Result
Allowed
Proof: Oct 2025 log, p. 11
Date
Dec 7, 2025
Account
Kyle Short
Reason given
Missing Person
What was typed
"a small person wearing a jacket"
Result
Allowed
Proof: Dec 2025 log, p. 44
Date
Dec 7, 2025
Account
Kyle Short
Reason given
Missing Person
What was typed
"person wearing a cream jacket"
Result
Allowed
Proof: Dec 2025 log, p. 44
Date
Dec 7, 2025
Account
Kyle Short
Reason given
Missing Person
What was typed
"person wearing a jacket with hearts on it"
Result
Allowed
Proof: Dec 2025 log, p. 45
Date
Dec 7, 2025
Account
Kyle Short
Reason given
Armed Person
What was typed
"person wearing jacket and black shorts"
Result
Allowed
Proof: Dec 2025 log, p. 45
Date
Dec 7, 2025
Account
Kyle Short
Reason given
Armed Person
What was typed
"person wearing black hoodie and black hat"
Result
Allowed
Proof: Dec 2025 log, p. 45
Date
Dec 7, 2025
Account
Stephanie Sjerven
Reason given
Agency Assist
What was typed
"male wearing all black and green backpack"
Result
Allowed
Proof: Dec 2025 log, p. 45
Date
Dec 7, 2025
Account
Stephanie Sjerven
Reason given
Agency Assist
What was typed
"male" Run three times in a row, across 5, then 65, then 109 cameras.
Result
Allowed
Proof: Dec 2025 log, p. 45
Date
Dec 9, 2025
Account
Damian Guerrero
Reason given
Runaway
What was typed
"native female wearing grey hoodie with green lettering and black pants" Flock blocked the word "native."
Result
Blocked
Proof: Dec 2025 log, p. 44
Date
Dec 9, 2025
Account
Damian Guerrero
Reason given
Runaway
What was typed
"female wearing grey hoodie with green lettering and black pants" Same search without "native," 13 seconds later.
Result
Allowed
Proof: Dec 2025 log, p. 44
Date
Dec 9, 2025
Account
Damian Guerrero
Reason given
Runaway
What was typed
"female wearing grey sweater"
Result
Allowed
Proof: Dec 2025 log, p. 44

Every row links to the page of the log it came from.

How this works

Plain English.

FreeForm

A search box where an officer types a description, like "male in a black hoodie," and Flock's AI finds matching people or cars on video.

Flock
The private company that sells the cameras and stores the data on its own servers.
Plate camera (ALPR)
A camera that photographs every passing car and reads the license plate.
Video camera (PTZ)
A camera police can steer and zoom. The city says these record all the time.
Search log
The record of every search an officer ran. The city released 13 months of them. Names appear as the city released them. License plates were blacked out.
Hit
An alert that fires when a camera sees a plate on a watch list.

Faces and the 100 video cameras

Every "do not" on the city's list is about the plate cameras.

The city told the council

“Casa Grande PD Flock ALPR cameras do not: Use facial recognition. Identify people by their faces.”
Chief's agenda document, page 5

The record shows

That describes Flock's software. It does not describe what an officer can do with a picture. Nothing in the handout or the department's policy stops an officer from taking a face from a camera image and running it through another tool, like Clearview AI.

Every "do not" on that list is about the plate cameras. The 100 video cameras "continually record activity in their field of view." That is the handout's own sentence, and the people searches above ran against those video cameras. Whenever a promise says "ALPR," ask what the same promise looks like for the video cameras, the drones, and the microphones.

100

video cameras that "continually record activity"

The handout, page 5

The list of things the plate cameras "do not" do. The people searches on this page ran against the video cameras, which the handout says "continually record activity in their field of view." Flock has also said its plate cameras can become video cameras through a cloud software update.

Source: Flock Q2 2025 product launch
Excerpt from page 5 of the city's handout listing what Casa Grande PD Flock ALPR cameras do not do, including use facial recognition and identify people by their faces.

See it yourself

Bottom line

A briefing said it cannot happen. The logs say it did. Ask for a rule.

The petition asks the council for a binding ordinance with a ban on people searches, outside audits with public results, and real consequences for misuse.