Courts

"Not yet ruled unconstitutional" is not "constitutional."

CGPD says state and federal courts have found no Fourth Amendment violation.

The biggest Flock case in the country is still on appeal.

The biggest Flock case in the country is not over. Two Norfolk, Virginia residents sued over 176 Flock cameras. In January 2026 the judge ruled for the city because 176 cameras did not capture "the whole" of a person's movements. They appealed. The appeal is pending.

Casa Grande is planning about 240 devices for a quarter of Norfolk's population, plus 100 video cameras that never stop recording, plus drones.

176

Flock cameras in Norfolk, Virginia, for about 240,000 people

240

devices planned in Casa Grande, for about 60,000 people

4x

roughly the cameras per person, plus 100 video cameras and drones

28 days

of GPS tracking the Supreme Court has already called a search

The claim and the record

Read the judge's reason before repeating the ruling.

The city told the council

“To date state and federal courts have determined it is not a violation of the Fourth Amendment.”
Chief's agenda document, page 8

The record shows

The biggest Flock case in the country is not over. Two Norfolk, Virginia residents sued over 176 Flock cameras. In February 2025 the court said their claim of dragnet surveillance was plausible enough to go forward. In January 2026 the judge ruled for the city. They appealed. The appeal is pending right now.

Read the judge's reason. He said 176 cameras did not capture "the whole" of a person's movements. Norfolk has about 240,000 people. Casa Grande is planning about 240 devices for about 60,000 people. That is roughly four times the cameras per person, plus 100 video cameras that never stop recording, plus drones.

The Supreme Court has already said that tracking a car with a GPS device for 28 days is a search, and that pulling months of phone location history is a search. Nobody has ruled on a network this dense. "Not yet ruled unconstitutional" is not "constitutional."

176

Norfolk cameras a judge called too few to track "the whole" of a life

See it yourself

The council can set a warrant standard now instead of waiting for a court to force one.

Bottom line

Nobody has ruled on a network this dense. Casa Grande should not be the test case.

The petition asks for warrants or comparable legal standards for location-history searches, the same protection courts already give cell phone records. Without one, the only check on misuse is the department itself, and officers elsewhere have used these systems to stalk people.