Civic action

Ask City Council for clear rules.

A respectful message from residents can make a difference. Keep it calm, factual, and focused on safeguards that protect public safety and ordinary residents.

Sign the Petition Before Contacting the Mayor

Key asks

  1. 1 Hold a public hearing on Flock with public comment and an independent expert who does not work for the department or Flock. The September 8, 2026 study session had neither.
  2. 2 Require regular third-party independent audits of Flock use, with public reporting of the results.
  3. 3 Add stronger contract language limiting Flock from selling, sharing, or monetizing machine-learned or derived data from Casa Grande.
  4. 4 Require warrants or comparable documented legal standards for sensitive Flock searches, similar to cell phone records.
  5. 5 Disable sharing Casa Grande Flock data with outside agencies unless City Council publicly approves a narrow exception.
  6. 6 Create clear legal and employment consequences for Casa Grande staff misuse, including stalking, harassment, or personal searches.
  7. 7 Allow the people of Casa Grande to vote out Flock and all future mass surveillance systems.

Short call script

Use your own words.

Hello, my name is [name], and I live in or care about Casa Grande. I support public safety and law enforcement, but powerful surveillance systems need clear public rules before they become part of everyday life. The September 8 study session had no public comment and no outside expert, and the city's own search logs contradict what the council was told. Please hold a public hearing on Flock and adopt a binding ordinance. I am asking for regular third-party audits and public reporting, warrants or comparable legal standards for sensitive searches, a ban on people searches and federal immigration searches, stronger data and sharing limits, real consequences for misuse, and a public vote on Flock and future mass surveillance systems. Thank you.

Contact the mayor

Reach Mayor Lisa Fitzgibbons

Call, email directly, mail a letter, or use the form below to send a prepared message in your own voice.

Call520-421-8600Tap to callEmail[email protected]Send directly
Mail
Lisa Fitzgibbons510 E Florence BlvdCasa Grande, AZ 85122

Please keep messages respectful and factual. Your name and email are included so city leaders know the message came from a real person.

Unanswered questions

26 questions the September 8 study session did not answer.

Pick one or two that matter to you and put them in your email or your three minutes at the microphone. Each one comes from the city's own records on our evidence page.

Federal agencies 3 questions +
  1. 1

    What was Officer Hill's assignment in early 2025, and who received the results of the 42 Border Patrol, ICE, and Marshals searches?

  2. 2

    Did those searches stop? When? Show the network audits since.

  3. 3

    Will the council require, in writing, that no search be run for a federal immigration agency and that Flock's immigration-sharing setting be turned off?

The record behind these questions: Searches labeled for Border Patrol, ICE, and the US Marshals.

Searching for people 2 questions +
  1. 1

    Is FreeForm people search still enabled? Who approved turning it on?

  2. 2

    When Flock blocks a search for race, who is notified, and what happened with the two blocked searches in the logs?

The record behind these questions: Officers searched the cameras for people by gender and clothing.

Audits 3 questions +
  1. 1

    When will an independent third party audit the system, how far back will it look, and will the results be public?

  2. 2

    Why do 12,406 of 18,391 searches, two out of three, have no real case number when the policy requires one? Why are 99 searches labeled "test" or "training"?

  3. 3

    Why is one case code reused across most of the border and immigration searches?

The record behind these questions: Two out of three searches have no real case number.

The complaint 2 questions +
  1. 1

    Who investigated the one misuse complaint, what was alleged, and will the file be released?

  2. 2

    Will misuse be referred for prosecution, not just discipline?

The record behind these questions: 60 officers used plate readers to stalk people.

Who has access 2 questions +
  1. 1

    How many accounts exist today? How many belong to civilians, interns, volunteers, contractors, or Flock employees?

  2. 2

    Which outside agencies can search Casa Grande's cameras, and who has received "Agency Assist" searches?

The record behind these questions: Within Arizona still reaches outside Arizona.

Data and the contract 2 questions +
  1. 1

    Will the city renegotiate to forbid Flock from training its products on Casa Grande data?

  2. 2

    Why is the 30-day retention period being reconsidered, and why not shorten it instead?

The record behind these questions: Perpetual = forever. Photos can be deleted. The data lives on.

Cameras, drones, and microphones 4 questions +
  1. 1

    Release the camera locations and the placement analysis by neighborhood.

  2. 2

    Which five businesses received free cameras, chosen how, and are the agreements public?

  3. 3

    How many drone flights so far, for what kinds of calls, and is drone video searchable?

  4. 4

    What sounds do the 31 gunshot devices classify today, and who can listen to the audio?

The record behind these questions: The "no audio" answer skips the 31 gunshot microphones.

Schools and kids 2 questions +
  1. 1

    Are the elementary school camera feeds searchable with FreeForm?

  2. 2

    Are parents told when footage of their child is viewed or searched?

The record behind these questions: Flock is in the elementary schools.

Security 2 questions +
  1. 1

    What happens when the system is breached, and who tells residents?

  2. 2

    Can Flock employees view Casa Grande cameras, and is that logged?

The record behind these questions: Camera feeds were left open on the internet.

Money and results 2 questions +
  1. 1

    Which state funds and grants pay for this, and what strings come with them?

  2. 2

    The department's own table shows 73 arrests from camera hits in 26 months. What does the city consider a good result for $1 million a year?

The record behind these questions: 240 devices for 60,000 people. 73 arrests in 26 months.

Rules 2 questions +
  1. 1

    Will the council adopt a binding ordinance instead of accepting a briefing?

  2. 2

    Will the council hold a second session with an independent expert who does not work for the department or Flock?

Keep the tone constructive.

The goal is not to insult officials or police officers. The goal is to ask for transparency, clear rules, and public accountability before a powerful surveillance system becomes normal in Casa Grande.